Qinfang Xue v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 202518-70775California865 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QINFANG XUE, No. 18-70775 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-195-384 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion.

See Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 993, 997 (9th Cir. 2007). Under that

standard, the court must affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.