Hobus
Hobus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JAN 3 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JACOB HOBUS, No. 23-3528
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. DC No. 3:21-cv-00080-AN HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP., a New Jersey Corporation, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 2, 2024 Portland, Oregon
Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Jacob Hobus appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in
defendant’s favor in his diversity action asserting product liability claims under
Oregon law against Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (“HOC”), the manufacturer of an
AccuLIF® TL Cage System that was implanted during surgery on Hobus’s spine.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district
court’s grant of…