Pardo

Pardo v. The County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20253:24-cv-01062California469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)

RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO

12 PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and ORDER (1) ACCEPTING VICTOR PARDO, PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND (2) GRANTING

Plaintiffs,

DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE MOTION

v. FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’

THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; REINA

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

LOPEZ; THOMAS RUFF; LONNIE

LAU; KIM GIARDIA; DHHS

(ECF Nos. 19, 20) DIRECTOR; NICK MACCHIONE; and

DOES 1–50,

19 Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant County of San Diego’s Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 20). Defendant requests an additional two weeks to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 19)—filed on December 20, 2024—due to the December holidays and Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with Civil Local 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.