Pardo
Pardo v. The County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)
RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO
12 PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and ORDER (1) ACCEPTING VICTOR PARDO, PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT, AND (2) GRANTING
Plaintiffs,
DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE MOTION
v. FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; REINA
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
LOPEZ; THOMAS RUFF; LONNIE
LAU; KIM GIARDIA; DHHS
(ECF Nos. 19, 20) DIRECTOR; NICK MACCHIONE; and
DOES 1–50,
19 Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant County of San Diego’s Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 20). Defendant requests an additional two weeks to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 19)—filed on December 20, 2024—due to the December holidays and Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with Civil Local 26 …