(SS) Gotterson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20251:22-cv-01383California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON ANTHONY GOTTERSON, No. 1:22-cv-01383-DC-HBK Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL

SECURITY, ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 25) 16 On October 26, 2022, Plaintiff Brandon Anthony Gotterson filed this action seeking review of a final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On October 2, 2024, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 22.) On January 2, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation with the court in which the parties agree that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $7,297.50.1 (Doc. No. 25.) Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ January 2, 2025 stipulation, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.