Ruelaz
Ruelaz v. Leprino Foods Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC RUELAZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-01017-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF ISAAC
RUELAZ’S MOTION TO REMAND
v. ACTION TO STATE COURT LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, (Doc. 4) Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Isaac Ruelaz’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand this action to state court, filed on September 5, 2024. (Doc. 4.) Defendant Leprino Foods Company (“Defendant”) opposed the motion on September 19, 2024, and Plaintiff filed a reply on September 24, 2024. (Docs. 6, 7.) The parties consented to jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). (Doc. 9.) Having considered the parties’ briefing and record, and for the reasons that follow, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to remand. /// /// /// /// I. Background On…