Cuevas

Cuevas v. Feghali Foods

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20251:24-cv-01581California3,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA CUEVAS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01581-KES-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

v. OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS FEGHALI FOODS, et al., (Docs. 1, 6) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Background On December 23, 2024, Plaintiff Joshua Cuevas filed this case against Defendants Feghali Foods and Feghali Brothers, LLC, alleging violations of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, and other state law causes of action. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered while visiting a facility owned, operated, or leased by Defendants. Id. at 3. No Defendant has appeared. On December 26, 2024, the undersigned ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim in light of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Vo v. Choi.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.