Doe

Doe v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20252:21-cv-01438California1,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA DOE, et al. No. 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPOINT

v. PLAINTIFF MARIA DOE AS GUARDIAN

AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF I.D.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al. (Doc. No. 102) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Maria Doe, Clara Doe, and I.D.’s motion for appointment of a guardian ad litem and petition for approval of the compromise of a minor. (Doc. No. 102.)1 Having reviewed the motion, the court finds it suitable for decision on the papers. Accordingly, the court vacates the hearing on the pending motion scheduled for January 17, 2025. For the reasons explained below the court will grant Plaintiffs’ request for the appointment of

1 Local Rule 202(a) provides “[u]pon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor or incompetent person, the attorney representing the minor or incompetent person” shall move for the appointment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.