(SS)(PS) Jameson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20252:23-cv-01305California2,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY S.J. JAMESON, No. 2:23-cv-01305-SCR 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, 16 Defendant. 17 Each of the parties in this case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); ECF No. 11. Accordingly, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. ECF No. 19. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The Court grants the Motion and dismisses this action. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff filed this action pro se on July 5, 2023. Plaintiff styled his complaint as a “Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus” and invoked the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1361 and 1651, as well as 5 U.S.C. § 706. ECF No. 1 at 4. Plaintiff states he has been waiting for almost a year for a hearing before the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) 27 1 Page citations such as this one are to the number generated on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.