Ma

(PC) Hill v. Ma

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20252:24-cv-02799California1,733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON V. HILL, No. 2:24-cv-2799 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JONATHAN MA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is before the Court. (ECF No. 13.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. I. SCREENING STANDARDS Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Id. A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984). The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous when it is based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.