Priccio

Moody v. Priccio

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20253:23-cv-01621California6,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SPARKLE MOODY, Case No. 23-cv-01621-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COLE PRICCIO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants City of San Leandro and Cole Pricco. ECF No. 57. Plaintiff Sparkle Moody filed an Opposition (ECF No. 63) and Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 66). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.2 II. BACKGROUND On April 4, 2021, Moody and her family were finishing dinner in their duplex home late in the evening when they were interrupted with a strobing, flashing light shining through their kitchen window. Compl. ¶ 8, ECF No. 1; Defs.’ Response to Pl.’ Separate Statement of Facts, ECF No. 66-1, Fact No. 66. A uniformed police officer, later identified as Defendant Pricco, had shined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.