Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20255:24-cv-00812California4,041 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACQUELINE JACKSON, Case No. 5:24-cv-00812-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendant.

Plaintiff Jacqueline Jackson brings this putative class action against defendant LinkedIn Corporation, alleging that LinkedIn used its Insight Tag to unlawfully obtain and use personal information from LinkedIn users visiting the California Department of Motor Vehicles website. LinkedIn moves to dismiss Jackson’s claim under the federal Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) for failure to state a claim, and argues that, if the Court dismisses that claim, it should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her state law claims. For the following reasons, the Court grants LinkedIn’s motion to dismiss the DPPA claim with prejudice and orders the parties to show cause why Jackson’s state law claims should or should not be dismissed without prejudice in the absence of any remaining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.