Roy

Roy v. Robinson Helicopter Company CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 2025B330904California7,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 1/6/25 Roy v. Robinson Helicopter Company CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DANIEL ROY, B330904

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV25235) v.

ROBINSON HELICOPTER

COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Deirdre Hill, Judge. Affirmed. Kristensen Law Group and John P. Kristensen for Plaintiff and Appellant. Tim A. Goetz for Defendant and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff and appellant Daniel Roy, personal representative of the Estate of Stéphane Roy, appeals the trial court’s order granting defendant and respondent Robinson Helicopter Company’s motion to stay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.