Crittendon

Crittendon v. MULDROW

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20253:22-cv-09153California1,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AJEENAH CRITTENDON, et al., Case No. 22-cv-09153-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

ANGELICA MULDROW,

13 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Defendant Angelica Muldrow moves to transfer venue in this matter, which has been partially reopened after the Ninth Circuit’s mandate, to the Northern District of Georgia. Muldrow argues the availability of witnesses to testify, Muldrow’s own financial limitations, and the judicial efficiency of litigating in a forum where Muldrow will be represented by counsel all support transfer. Plaintiff Ajeenah Crittendon offers no substantive opposition to the transfer. This motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the foregoing reasons, Muldrow’s Motion to Transfer is granted.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Ajeenah Crittendon and EZ E-File Tax…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.