Sexton

(PC) Harris v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20251:18-cv-00080California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S HARRIS, No. 1:18-cv-0080 DC SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGUIRRE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. (ECF No. 123.) Defendants argue that because plaintiff has been released, he is no longer entitled to proceed in forma pauperis as a prisoner under 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(2). In his opposition, plaintiff states that his financial status has not changed since his release, he is currently living in a transitional housing facility paid for by the Department of Corrections, and he is receiving general assistance and food stamps. (ECF No. 130.) Defendants did not file a reply brief. Plaintiff signed his opposition brief under penalty of perjury. This court finds plaintiff’s statements regarding his financial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.