Brinker

Brinker v. Axos Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20253:22-cv-00386California767 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JENNIFER BREAR BRINKER, Case No.: 22-cv-0386-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S RULE 72 OBJECTION

AXOS BANK, et al., [Doc. No. 126]

Defendants. 14 JOHN TOLLA, et al., 15 Counter-Claimants, 16 v.

JENNIFER BREAR BRINKER,

18 Counter-Defendant. 19 20 On September 23, 2024, Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner issued a Discovery Order denying Plaintiff Jennifer Brear Brinker’s motion to compel production of documents. See Doc. No. 118. Plaintiff now objects to the Discovery Order on various grounds. See Doc. No. 126. Defendant Axos Bank has filed a response in opposition to the objection, to which Plaintiff replied. See Doc. Nos. 166, 163. For the reasons set forth below, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s objection. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a party may object to a non- dispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge within fourteen days of service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.