Bonazza

Bonazza v. MUFG Bank, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20253:23-cv-01161California3,734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ALAN BONAZZA,

Case No. 23-cv-01161-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

MUFG BANK, LTD.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 121, 122 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION The parties in this employment discrimination case have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion is DENIED. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.1 This case is dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Bonazza initiated this employment discrimination case against Defendant MUFG Bank, Ltd. (“MUFG”) in the District of Hawaii on February 23, 2023. That court transferred the case to this District and the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court found that Bonazza asserted viable claims for employment discrimination based on race and sex under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.