Autec Power, Inc. v. Vencient Barnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20252:23-cv-09273California2,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-9273-MRA (JPRx) Date: January 3, 2025 Title: Autec Power, Inc., et al. v. Vencient Barnes et al. ============================================================ DOCKET ENTRY: Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 71) ===========================================================

PRESENT:

HON. JEAN P. ROSENBLUTH, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Bea Martinez n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None present None present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On October 25, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Defendant Autec Power, Inc.,1 to produce documents and serve supplementary interrogatory responses. But the Court found that Plaintiffs had not provided any evidence to support their request for attorney’s fees for having to bring the motion. On November 8, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a separate motion, with evidence, requesting the fees. Defendant opposed on November 22, and Plaintiffs replied on November 29.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.