Uniformed Sanitationmen's Association Compensation Accrual Fund v. Equinix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20253:24-cv-02656California3,961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIFORMED SANITATIONMEN’S Case No. 24-cv-02656-VC

ASSOCIATION COMPENSATION

ACCRUAL FUND,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 54 v.

EQUINIX, INC., et al., Defendants.

The motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. This ruling assumes the reader is familiar with the complaint’s allegations, the applicable legal standards, and the arguments made by the parties. I The defendants ask the Court to take judicial notice of 26 exhibits. The plaintiff objects to Exhibits 11-16. The request is granted as to the unopposed exhibits. As the plaintiff acknowledges, judicial notice can be taken for SEC filings, analyst reports, earnings call and Analyst/Investor Day transcripts, and court filings “for the purpose of determining what information was available to the market.” In re Splunk Inc. Securities Litigation, 592 F. Supp. 3d 919, 930 (N.D. Cal. 2022); see Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., 899 F.3d 988, 999 (9th Cir. 2018). The Court does not take notice of them for the truth of the statements they contain. The request is also granted as to Exhibits 11-16. The plaintiff argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.