Savoie

(PC) Cruz v. Savoie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20251:21-cv-01552California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, No. 1:21-cv-01552-KES-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY THE COURT’S ORDER

S. SAVOIE, et al., TO PAY FILING FEE Defendants. Doc. 24 16 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 25, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations identifying plaintiff as a three strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and concluding that he did not qualify for the imminent danger exception. See Doc. 5. The magistrate judge therefore recommended that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. See id. On November 22, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.