Markeith A. Clinton v. The People

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20252:24-cv-10391California1,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

MARKEITH A. CLINTON, No. 2:24-cv-10391-SVW-BFM Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HABEAS PETITION

JAMES HILL, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

15 Respondent. 16 17 SUMMARY OF ORDER Petitioner Markeith A. Clinton filed a “Notice of Appeal” in this Court, purporting to appeal a judgment entered on August 24, 2024. Despite a slight date discrepancy, it appears the judgment Clinton intends to appeal is the August 21, 2024, order of the California Supreme Court denying Clinton’s petition for review. As best this Court can tell, that petition for review related

1 Petitioner named “The People” as the respondent in this action. The proper respondent is James Hill, the warden at Petitioner’s place of incarceration. See 26 Rule 2(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.