Quach
Quach v. Walgreen Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DACIANA QUACH, Case No. 24-cv-07052-JSW
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
v. ORDER TO PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
WALGREEN CO., TRANSFERRED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No.
13 The Court has received and considered the parties’ joint case management conference 14 statement. The Court VACATES the case management conference scheduled for January 10, 15 2025 and reserves setting any deadlines. 16 According to Defendant, Plaintiff worked in one of its stores in Bakersfield, California. 17 Although Plaintiff filed her complaint in the San Mateo Superior Court, she does not allege where 18 she resides. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404(a), the Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to 19 show cause why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the 20 Eastern District of California. See Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9thc Cir. 1986) 21 (noting a district…