McFadden

McFadden v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20251:23-cv-01421California3,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY AARON MCFADDEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01421-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

PRECLUDE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

v. AND

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (Doc. 33) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jeffery Aaron McFadden (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on September 29, 2023, against Defendants City of Bakersfield, T. Schleicher, Sims, Blankenship, Andrew Celedon, Doyle, Kniffen, and Skidmore (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1). Plaintiff raises the following claims against Defendants: unreasonable seizure, excessive force, failure to intercede and Monell violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to exclude from evidence certain of the opinions of Plaintiff’s expert witness due to Plaintiff’s alleged discovery violations, filed November 5, 25 26 27 28 2024. (Doc. 33). Plaintiff filed an opposition1 and Defendants replied. (Docs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.