Cheek

(PC) Stokes v. Cheek

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20251:24-cv-00691California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE STOKES, Case No. 1:24-cv-00691-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT OKRI SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

CHEEK, et al., INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

SERVICE

Defendants. (ECF No. 20)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Antwone Stokes (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Cheek, Okri, and Alverez for failure to protect and denial of medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On December 23, 2024, the Court issued an order directing service on Defendants under the Court’s E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 20.) The order included the following information regarding Defendant Okri: “Mr. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.