Cherise Marie Walton v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20255:24-cv-01191California4,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 CHERISE MARIE WALTON, an Case No. 5:24-cv-01191-JGB-SPx individual;,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

Plaintiff, ORDER

v. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; DEPUTY MOLINA, an individual; DEPUTY MORALES, an individual; DEPUTY JIMENEZ, an individual; DEPUTY PINA, an individual; DEPUTY REINA, an individual; CHAD BIANCO, an individual; VICTORIA VARISCO- FLORES, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,,

Defendant.

21 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.