Espinoza

(PC) Mejia v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20251:24-cv-01381California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JOSUE A. MEJIA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01381-KES-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THIS CASE PROCEED ONLY ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS (1) FOR ESPINOZA, et al., EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE AGAINST DEFENDANTS ESPINOZA, PANGALDAN, Defendants. AYALA, GUITERREZ, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, AND LOPEZ; (2) FOR FAILURE

TO PROTECT AGAINST DEFENDANTS

JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2; (3) FOR

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO

SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS AGAINST

DEFENDANT PANGALDAN; AND (4)

FOR RETALIATION AGAINST

DEFENDANT GOMEZ

17 (ECF Nos. 1, 7, 12)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

20 21 Plaintiff Josue A. Mejia, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this 22 civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 6).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.