Newsom

(PC) Hill v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20252:19-cv-01680California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HILL, No. 2:19-cv-1680 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without a lawyer in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for correction or clarification of the discovery and scheduling order and to compel discovery. ECF Nos. 128-30. Plaintiff’s motion for correction or clarification of the scheduling order will be granted. The correct date for the close of discovery is February 7, 2025, not February 7, 2024. Plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery will be denied. Plaintiff seeks to have defendants provide written responses to what appear to be interrogatories and requests for productions. See ECF Nos. 129, 130. However, plaintiff has not shown that he has served defendants with these interrogatory and production requests and that defendants have failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.