Sergent

(PC) Gates v. Sergent

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20252:22-cv-01576California1,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN D. GATES, No. 2:22-cv-1576 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS S. SERGENT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the following reasons, this Court recommends that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. On April 20, 2023, the Court advised plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF No. 32.) On August 27, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 44.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition. On September 25, 2024, this Court granted plaintiff thirty additional days to file an opposition. (ECF No. 46.) In the order filed September 25, 2024, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.