Hudson

Hudson v. Pfizer Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20252:24-cv-03441California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 JENNIFER HUDSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-03441-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT

STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION

v. Complaint Filed: December 11, 2024 13 PFIZER INC., VIATRIS INC., GREENSTONE Trial Date: None set

LLC, PRASCOLABS, PHARMACIA &

14 UPJOHN; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. 16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

28 ] Before the Court is the stipulation of Jennifer Hudson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Pfizer 2 || Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, Prasco, LLC d/b/a Prasco Laboratories, Viatris Inc., and 3 || Greenstone LLC (“Defendants”), to stay this action. On November 26, 2024, certain plaintiffs filed a petition with the Judicial Panel on 5 || Multidistrict Litigation (““JPML”) to centralize this and other cases in which plaintiffs allege 6 || personal injuries relating to the use of Depo-Provera, into a Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL”) (the 7 || “Petition”). The JPML has set the Petition for a hearing on January 30, 2025, and is expected to 8 || decide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.