Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PROJECT VERITAS; PROJECT No. 22-35271
VERITAS ACTION FUND,
D.C. No. 3:20-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 01435-MO
v.
OPINION
MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney; ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted En Banc June 25, 2024 Seattle, Washington
Filed January 7, 2025
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Morgan Christen, Mark J. Bennett, Daniel P. Collins, Kenneth K. Lee, Jennifer Sung, Gabriel P. Sanchez, Roopali H. Desai, Anthony D. Johnstone and Ana de Alba, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Christen; Concurrence by Judge Bennett; Dissent by Judge Lee
SUMMARY *
First Amendment
The en banc court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a complaint brought by Project Veritas, a nonprofit media organization engaged almost exclusively in undercover journalism, alleging that Oregon’s conversational privacy statute violates…