Pham

Pham v. Nguyen CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 2025H051679California5,465 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

A. Allegations of the Operative Complaint

An and Olivia divorced in 2004, and An then married Pham. In 2007, An and Olivia reached a stipulated judgment on reserved issues in their dissolution. As part of the 2007 stipulation, they agreed to sell jointly owned real property located in Fawnskin, California and to equally divide the sale proceeds. But they did not sell the property. An and Pham divorced in California in 2007, but An also sued Pham in Vietnam. In 2011, the Santa Clara County Superior Court accepted their “Stipulation and Order Regarding Global Settlement of All Issues,” by which An and Pham agreed to “all the remaining issues of support, division of assets, and division of liabilities, relating to all properties located in both [California] and in Vietnam.” As a part of the 2011 stipulated order, Pham was to receive five apartments in Vietnam in satisfaction of An’s obligation to support their two minor children; other property in Vietnam was to be put in trust for the children; and An was to conclude the Vietnam litigation on terms consistent with the 2011 stipulated order. An did not comply with the 2011 stipulated order, however, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.