People v. Ruvalcaba CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 2025C095929California7,150 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/7/25 P. v. Ruvalcaba CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Glenn) ----

THE PEOPLE, C095929

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 16NCR10593)

v.

ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ RUVALCABA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Alfredo Rodriguez Ruvalcaba appeals from his conviction of first degree murder, arguing that his hospital bed confession was made without a proper waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda), and should not have been admitted as evidence against him. We disagree and affirm.

LEGAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On July 4, 2015, at approximately 1:20 p.m., officers arrived at Ruvalcaba’s orchard property to investigate a possible homicide or suicide. In a small…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.