Balu
Balu v. Druckman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARVIND BALU, Case No. 24-cv-02088-SI
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS
REBECCA DRUCKMAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 31 Defendants.
12 13 The defendants in this action have filed two motions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Dkt. Nos. 23 and 31. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the motions are suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearings on January 10, 2025 and January 31, 2025. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motions and DISMISSES plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. 19 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Arvind Balu (“plaintiff”) pursues this litigation as a result of a series of events that started twenty-seven years ago. In 1997, plaintiff was arrested and convicted of committing numerous felonies. See Balu v. Lake County et al., No. 3:08-cv-03014-SI (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. No. …