The Estate of Roselee Bartolacci v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20253:24-cv-01156California5,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE ESTATE OF ROSELEE Case No.: 24-cv-01156-WQH-JLB BARTOLACCI, by and through its 12 successor in interest, ROSEANN ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND BARTOLACCI, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE

Plaintiff,

TO CONDUCT LIMITED EARLY

v. DISCOVERY TO ASCERTAIN “DOE” DEFENDANTS’ IDENTITIES COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 39] 18 Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s November 11, 2024, Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Early Discovery to Ascertain “Doe” Defendants’ Identities (“Motion”). (ECF No. 39.) On November 13, 2024, Defendants County of San Diego, Ricardo Carlon, Sherry Esquivel, Macy Germono, Kelly Martinez, Paul Mata, Evangelina Reynoso, Diorella Rioveros, and Janine Sparks (hereinafter “County Defendants”) filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion (“Opposition”). (ECF No. 41.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.