Alvarez

Alvarez v. Morris Shea Bridge Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20251:24-cv-00723California994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERGIO ALVAREZ, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0723 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING v. ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND MORRIS-SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY, ) ) (Docs. 22, 41) Defendant. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A ) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 ) DAYS )

Sergio Alvarez seeks to hold Morris-Shea Bridge Company liable, suggesting the company retaliated against him. (See Docs. 1-3, 20.) Defendant moved to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asserting Plaintiff “fails to state facts sufficient to establish any claim upon which relief can be granted.” (Doc. 22 at 2.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed “to include sufficient factual allegations identifying what happened, when it happened, or who was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.