Epperson

Epperson v. Codification Order 497

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20251:24-cv-01355California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS EPPERSON, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-1355 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CODIFICATION ORDER 497, et al., ) THIS CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 11) ) )

Chris Epperson seeks to proceed pro se in this civil rights action, asserting the court has federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction over a claim for violation of the “Judiciary Order of 1758 obligated … public contract of the Tarrif (sic) Act of 1798.” (Doc. 1 at 3-5.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and found Plaintiff failed comply with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or allege facts sufficient to support a conclusion the Court has jurisdiction over the action. (Doc. 4 3-4.) The Court provided the relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.