Zavala

Zavala v. Valdes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20251:24-cv-01360California568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO ZAVALA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01360-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL

12 ROBERT VALDES, (Doc. 4) 13 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE _____________________________________/

15 Plaintiff Antonio Zavala is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 1, 3.) Plaintiff filed a complaint on November 6, 2024. On November 19, 2024, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days or to notify the Court that he wishes to stand on his complaint. (Doc. 4.) The screening order was served on Plaintiff by mail on November 27, 2024. (See Docket.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, notified the Court of his intention to stand on his complaint, or requested an extension of time in which to do so. The Local Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.