(HC) Medina v. On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20251:24-cv-01425California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MEDINA, Case No.: 1:24-cv-01425 JLT SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS v. CORPUS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

CLOSE CASE

UNNAMED, (Doc. 5)

Respondent. ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

17 Robert Medina is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The assigned magistrate judge performed a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and found “Petitioner indicates throughout his petition that he has not sought relief in the state courts for his claim.” (Doc. 5 at 3.) Furthermore, the magistrate judge observed that Petitioner failed to name a proper respondent, which also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.