Walker

(PC) Davis v. Walker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20252:08-cv-00593California1,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Kennard Davis, No. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM SCR Plaintiff, Vv. James Walker, et al., Defendants. 16 Kennard Davis, No. 2:10-cv-2139 KIM SCR Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. James Walker, et al., 2] Defendants. 22 23 24 25

Plaintiff brings civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She has filed four types of motions: (1) registering objections to the magistrate judge’s order declining to allow plaintiff to cross-examine experts who have submitted evidence to the court on plaintiff’s physical and mental health; (2) seeking a telephonic or status conference; (3) seeking this court’s recusal, and (4) making objections to various rulings in minute orders by the magistrate judge. For the reasons that follow, these motions are denied. I. BACKGROUND These cases have long procedural histories, and it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.