Valenzuela Alcazar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 202523-4404California818 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAOLA VALENZUELA ALCAZAR, No. 23-4404 Agency No. Petitioner, A240-251-592 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 7, 2024** Submission Withdrawn November 15, 2024 Resubmitted January 8, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Paola Valenzuela Alcazar (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We review the BIA’s

legal determinations de novo” and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.