Giguiere

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Giguiere

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20253:18-cv-01530California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 18-cv-1530-WQH-JLB

COMMISSION,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 11 v.

GANNON GIGUIERE; OLIVER-

BARRET LINDSAY; ANDREW

HACKETT, KEVIN GILLESPIE; and ANNETTA BUDHU, 15 Defendants. 16 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the crossclaims asserted by Defendant Andrew Hackett (“Hackett”) against Defendants Kevin Gillespie and Annetta Budhu (ECF No. 144) and the “Defendant’s Showing of Cause for Failure to Prosecute and Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants Gillespie and Budhu” (the “Motion Showing Cause and Requesting Default Judgment”) (ECF No. 248) filed by Hackett. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 6, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Gannon Giguiere, Oliver-Barret Lindsay, Andrew Hackett, 26 27 28 Kevin Gillespie (“Gillespie”), and Annetta Budhu (“Budhu”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging federal securities laws violations. (ECF No. 1.)1 As relevant here,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.