Jorge Ernesto Ramirez Ceballos v. Banda Maguey Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20252:23-cv-10911California4,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 DMartinez@RobinsKaplan.com Daniel Allender, Bar No. 264651 DAllender@RobinsKaplan.com Luis D. Gomez, Bar No. 347877 LGomez@RobinsKaplan.com ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310.552.0130 Facsimile: 310.229.5800 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jorge Ernesto Ramirez Ceballos; Fernando Guardado Rosales; Jose Rosario Cisneros Gutierrez; and Luis Antonio Plasencia Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 Jorge Ernesto Ramirez Ceballos; Case No. 2:23-cv-10911-CBM-MAR

Fernando Guardado Rosales; Jose Rosario Cisneros Gutierrez; and [Assigned to the Honorable Judge Luis Antonio Plasencia Martinez Consuelo B. Marshall] 15 Plaintiffs, Referred to: Hon. Margo A. Rocconi 16 v. DISCOVERY MATTER 17 Banda Maguey Corporation, dba STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Banda Maguey USA, Inc.; Miguel Angel Vidal Pulido; Samuel Vidal Pulido; and DOES 1 through 10, [Action filed: December 31, 2023] inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 Miguel Angel Vidal Pulido, Counterclaimant, 23 v. 24 Jorge Ernesto…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.