Stanz
Stanz v. Brown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Plaintiff AARON STANZ, individually Case No.: 3:22-cv-01164-GPC-JLB and derivatively on behalf of Jet Genius 12 Holdings, Inc., ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS Plaintiff,
COUNSEL
14 v. [ECF No. 179] Defendants JORDAN BROWN; et al., 16 Defendants, 17 and
JET GENIUS HOLDINGS, INC.,
20 Nominal Defendant.
22 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.3(f)(3), the law firm of Higgs Fletcher & Mack, 23 and all attorneys associated with it including Sean M. Sullivan and Justin M. Martin 24 (“Movant”), filed an ex parte motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendants Bowman 25 Aviation, Inc., Jet Agency Global LLC, C3 Limo LLC, Jordan Brown, Jet Genius 26 Holdings, Inc., Jet Genius Florida Holdings, Inc., C3 Jets LLC (“Defendants”), on 27 1 || grounds that Defendants did not meet the material terms of the Engagement Agreement, permitting withdrawal under Rule 1.16(b)(5) of California’s Rules of Professional |}Conduct. ECF No. …