Richel Nash v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICHEL NASH, an individual, No. 2:24-cv-02222
Plaintiff, Order GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Richel v. Nash’s Motion for Remand and Request for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. JO-ANN STORES, LLC, a 20) corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
Defendants.
Defendant Jo-Ann Stores, LLC removed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Dkt. 1 (NOR). Plaintiff Richel Nash moves for remand and requests attorneys’ fees and costs. Dkt. 20 (Mot.). The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. [The hearing set for January 13, 2025 is removed from the Court’s calendar.] Nash stipulates that she “will not seek or accept any amount in excess of $74,999 in this action.” Dkt. 20-3 ¶ 5. Jo-Ann Stores does not oppose remand per Nash’s stipulation. Dkt. 22 (Opp’n) at 2. Jo-Ann Stores opposes only Nash’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs, arguing that removal was objectively reasonable. Opp’n at 2. The Court agrees. There is complete diversity here because Nash, who is a citizen of California, does…