Richel Nash v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20252:24-cv-02222California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHEL NASH, an individual, No. 2:24-cv-02222

Plaintiff, Order GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Richel v. Nash’s Motion for Remand and Request for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. JO-ANN STORES, LLC, a 20) corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Defendant Jo-Ann Stores, LLC removed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Dkt. 1 (NOR). Plaintiff Richel Nash moves for remand and requests attorneys’ fees and costs. Dkt. 20 (Mot.). The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. [The hearing set for January 13, 2025 is removed from the Court’s calendar.] Nash stipulates that she “will not seek or accept any amount in excess of $74,999 in this action.” Dkt. 20-3 ¶ 5. Jo-Ann Stores does not oppose remand per Nash’s stipulation. Dkt. 22 (Opp’n) at 2. Jo-Ann Stores opposes only Nash’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs, arguing that removal was objectively reasonable. Opp’n at 2. The Court agrees. There is complete diversity here because Nash, who is a citizen of California, does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.