Ocampo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ESTEBAN OCAMPO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01110-KES-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

v. COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S

ORDERS

13 (Doc. 14) 14 THE CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the operative complaint in this action on October 16, 2024. (Docs. 13, 14, 17.) On November 15, 2024, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within twenty-one days. (Doc. 27.) On December 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Letter” in response to the screening order, that states: “I stand by my statement and believe that the evidence supporting my claims is substantial.” (Doc. 28). Therefore, the Court construes Plaintiff’s “Letter” as a notification that Plaintiff wishes to stand on his complaint. For the reasons…