Dyer
Smith v. Dyer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01288 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
v. DISMISSING THE ACTION, AND
DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
JERRY DYER and MARAGET MIMS, CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 4) 16 Candace Smith seeks to hold Jerry Dyer and Maraget Mims1 liable for several criminal acts including—but not limited to—stalking, harassment, attempted murder, and “using power [and] influence to get sex,” invasion of privacy, and hacking. (See Doc. 1 at 5.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 4.) The magistrate judge found “Plaintiff’s complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this action.” (Doc. 4 at 7; see also id. at 3-7.) In addition, the magistrate judge…