Dyer

Smith v. Dyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20251:24-cv-01288California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01288 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION, AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

JERRY DYER and MARAGET MIMS, CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 4) 16 Candace Smith seeks to hold Jerry Dyer and Maraget Mims1 liable for several criminal acts including—but not limited to—stalking, harassment, attempted murder, and “using power [and] influence to get sex,” invasion of privacy, and hacking. (See Doc. 1 at 5.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 4.) The magistrate judge found “Plaintiff’s complaint fails to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this action.” (Doc. 4 at 7; see also id. at 3-7.) In addition, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.