Holmes

Holmes v. Horg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20251:24-cv-01573California2,873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAMEAD HOLMES, Case No. 1:24-cv-01573-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASED

ON (1) LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER

JAMES HORG, et al., JURISDICTION; AND (2) THE YOUNGER

ABSTENTION AND ROOKER-FELDMAN

Defendants. DOCTRINES (ECF No. 1). OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

17 18 Plaintiff Damead Holmes proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (ECF 19 Nos. 1, 3). Generally, Plaintiff seeks a temporary restraining order under a federal criminal statute 20 in connection with a dispute involving board members of his church. However, because (1) the 21 criminal statute that Plaintiff relies on to establish the Court’s jurisdiction fails to support any 22 private right of action and (2) there are ongoing state court proceedings relating to the events 23 mentioned in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.