Macomber

(HC) Castillo v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20251:24-cv-01586California1,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL ANTHONY CASTILLO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01586-SAB-HC

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

JEFF MACOMBER,

Respondent.

13 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. BACKGROUND In 2017, Petitioner was convicted in the Kern County Superior Court and sentenced to an imprisonment term of fifty years to life plus twenty-five years and four months. (ECF No. 1 at 1.1) In 2020, the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, remanded the matter for the trial court to address various sentencing issues, and the California Supreme Court denied the petition for review. (Id. at 2.) Petitioner also filed a petition for resentencing in the superior court, which denied the petition in 2024. (Id. at 3.) On December 26, 2024, the Court received the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus that raises…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.