S.K.

S.K. v. Jupiter Research, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20253:24-cv-09090California1,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 S.K., et al., Case No. 24-cv-09090-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. TO PROCEED PSEUDONYMOUSLY

JUPITER RESEARCH, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 3 Defendants.

11 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonyms and for a protective order. Dkt. 3 (the “Motion”). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion without prejudice to any Defendant’s ability to seek to unseal Plaintiffs’ identities once the Defendants appear in this action. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are three individuals who have indirectly purchased vaporized cannabis oil from Defendants. See Dkt. 1 (complaint) ¶¶ 18-30. They claim that they paid supercompetitive prices for such products as a result of Defendants’ anticompetitive conduct. See generally Dkt. 1. Shortly after filing the complaint, Plaintiffs filed the Motion, seeking permission to proceed pseudonymously in this case “due to the significant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.