White

White v. Sacramento Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20252:21-cv-02211California1,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEGAN WHITE; JERONIMO No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR

AGUILAR; LOREN WAYNE KIDD,

LYRIC NASH; NICOLLETTE JONES; and ODETTE ZAPATA, ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v.

SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT;

THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO; DANIEL HAHN; and DOES 1-200 (the names and numbers of which are currently unknown), 18 Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Loren Wayne Kidd’s claim for failure to accommodate. See Mot., ECF No. 78. The Court previously heard and ruled on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to other claims. See Minute Order, ECF No. 92. At the hearing, the Court requested supplemental briefs regarding Kidd’s claim which the parties submitted. See Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief, ECF No. 93; Defendants’ Supplemental Brief, ECF No. 94. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion as to 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.