Koubong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-01871-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER S.KOUBONG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2024, Plaintiff filed objections to orders filed by this Court on September 6, 2024, and September 17, 2024. (ECF No. 22.) This Court construes Plaintiff’s objections to these orders as requests for reconsideration. Although motions to reconsider are directed to the sound discretion of the Court, Frito- Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Canas, 92 F.R.D. 384, 390 (D.C. Puerto Rico 1981), considerations of judicial economy weigh heavily in the process. Thus, Local Rule 230(j) requires that a party seeking reconsideration of a district court’s order must brief the “new or different facts or circumstances [which] were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion.” …